Russian Formalism
Shklovsky · Jakobson · Propp · Prague School
Complete UGC NET notes — defamiliarization (ostranenie), fabula vs syuzhet, Jakobson’s six functions, foregrounding, Propp’s morphology, Prague School. What the exam tests, and common traps. By Prof. Amirul Khan.
1915–1930
Period
OPOYAZ / Prague School
Key group
Defamiliarization
Central concept
Directly tested
June 2025
Why NET Candidates Must Know Russian Formalism
Russian Formalism was directly and heavily tested in the June 2025 UGC NET — one of the most challenging recent papers. The exam tested specific terms: defamiliarization, ostranenie, fabula/syuzhet, Jakobson’s six functions, foregrounding. These concepts also underlie Structuralism and Poststructuralism — making Russian Formalism the gateway to understanding Units VIII and IX of the syllabus. It is the starting point of modern literary theory as a discipline.
Context: OPOYAZ, Moscow Linguistic Circle, and the Prague School
Russian Formalism emerged in Russia between approximately 1915 and 1930, in two overlapping groups: OPOYAZ (Society for the Study of Poetic Language, founded in St. Petersburg/Petrograd, 1916) — whose key members were Viktor Shklovsky, Boris Eichenbaum, and Yuri Tynyanov — and the Moscow Linguistic Circle (founded 1915) — whose key member was Roman Jakobson.
The Formalists made a radical claim: the proper object of literary study is not the author’s biography, the historical context, or the moral content of literature, but its literariness(literaturnost’) — the specifically literary devices and techniques that distinguish a work of literature from any other use of language. They wanted to found a genuinely scientific study of literature by identifying the formal properties that make literary language different from everyday language.
After Stalin’s consolidation of power in the late 1920s, Russian Formalism was suppressed as politically suspect. Jakobson emigrated and helped found the Prague Linguistic Circle (1926), which continued and extended Formalist ideas through the concepts of foregrounding and the dominant. The Prague School’s synthesis, mediated through René Wellek and Austin Warren’s Theory of Literature (1949), shaped Anglo-American literary theory through the mid-century.
Key Thinkers
Viktor Shklovsky
OPOYAZ founder1893–1984Defamiliarization (ostranenie) — 'Art as Technique' (1917). Fabula/syuzhet distinction. Theory of Prose (1925).
NET focus: 'Art as Technique' (1917) is the most tested Formalist essay. Know the essay title, author, and core concept.
Roman Jakobson
OPOYAZ / Prague School1896–1982Six functions of language (Poetic Function dominant for literary theory). Poetic function: 'projects equivalence from axis of selection onto axis of combination.' Co-founded Prague Linguistic Circle (1926).
NET focus: Know all six functions and which factor each is oriented toward. The Poetic Function is the most tested.
Vladimir Propp
Narrative morphology1895–1970Morphology of the Folktale (1928) — 31 narrative functions, 7 spheres of action (character roles). Functions defined by their role in the plot, not by character or circumstance.
NET focus: Morphology of the Folktale (1928). Know the 7 character roles: Villain, Donor, Helper, Princess, Dispatcher, Hero, False Hero.
Boris Eichenbaum
OPOYAZ member1886–1959Theory of the 'skaz' (oral narrative style). Essay 'How Gogol's Overcoat is Made' (1919) — pioneered close formal analysis of prose fiction. Co-wrote 'The Theory of the Formal Method' (1926).
NET focus: 'How Gogol's Overcoat is Made' (1919) — the first major Formalist prose analysis. Know the essay and author.
Jan Mukařovský
Prague School1891–1975Foregrounding (aktualisace) — literary language systematically deviates from or intensifies ordinary language norms. Aesthetic function as a social relation, not a property of the object.
NET focus: Foregrounding is the Prague School's primary contribution. Know its relation to defamiliarization.
René Wellek & Austin Warren
Theory of Literature1903–1995 / 1899–1986Theory of Literature (1949) — synthesised Russian Formalism and Prague School for English readers. Intrinsic vs extrinsic approaches to literature. The foundational text of mid-century Anglo-American literary theory.
NET focus: Theory of Literature (1949) is directly tested in UGC NET. Know the intrinsic/extrinsic distinction.
Key Concepts
Defamiliarization / Ostranenie
Conceptостранение (ostranenie) — 'making strange'
Viktor Shklovsky, 'Art as Technique' (1917)
Art's purpose is to break habitual, automatic perception by making the familiar seem strange. By making form difficult and extended, art forces the reader to experience the object directly rather than processing it through automatic recognition. Shklovsky's examples: Tolstoy's technique of describing familiar things from a naive perspective that strips away conventional understanding.
Fabula vs Syuzhet
Conceptфабула (fabula) / сюжет (syuzhet)
Russian Formalists (Shklovsky, Tomashevsky)
Fabula: the raw events of the story in chronological order — 'what happened.' Syuzhet: the artistic arrangement of those events in the narrative — how the story is told, including order, pace, flashbacks, and withheld information. Literary artistry operates in the relationship between fabula and syuzhet. English equivalents: story (fabula) / plot or discourse (syuzhet). French equivalents: histoire / récit.
Poetic Function
ConceptFrom Jakobson's six functions of language (1960)
Roman Jakobson, 'Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics' (1960)
The sixth of Jakobson's six language functions. Oriented toward the Message itself rather than the referent, addresser, addressee, contact, or code. The Poetic Function foregrounds the formal properties of language — sound, rhythm, word order, structural patterning — as objects of attention in themselves. Jakobson's definition: it 'projects the principle of equivalence from the axis of selection onto the axis of combination.'
Foregrounding
ConceptAktualisace (Czech) — Prague School term
Jan Mukařovský / Prague Linguistic Circle
Literary language systematically deviates from (or intensifies) the norms of ordinary language, thereby drawing attention to the medium itself. In ordinary language the medium is transparent — we look through words to meaning. In literary language the medium is foregrounded — words become objects of attention. Works through: (1) deviation from norms (unexpected word choice, syntax); (2) parallelism and patterning (rhyme, metre — conspicuous regularity). Extends and systematises Shklovsky's defamiliarization.
Dominant
ConceptDominanta
Roman Jakobson / Prague School
The dominant is the focusing component of a work of art — the element that rules, determines, and transforms the other components. In poetry, verse (rhyme, metre, rhythm) is typically the dominant; in prose fiction, plot is often dominant. Jakobson: 'The dominant may be defined as the focusing component of a work of art: it rules, determines, and transforms the remaining components.' Different literary periods have different dominants (e.g., in Romanticism, the emotive/expressive function; in Realism, the referential function).
Literary Evolution / Defamiliarization of Form
ConceptLiterary history as succession of formal devices
Viktor Shklovsky / Russian Formalism
Russian Formalists proposed a theory of literary history based on form rather than content or social context. Literary forms become automatised over time — readers grow used to them, and they lose their defamiliarizing power. When a form becomes automatised, it is replaced by a new form that defamiliarises it. Literary history is the succession of dominant forms as old forms are replaced by new ones that make them strange again. This was a direct challenge to historicist and biographical approaches to literary history.
Jakobson’s Six Functions of Language
| Function | Oriented Toward | Description / Example |
|---|---|---|
| Emotive / Expressive | Addresser (sender) | Expresses the sender's feelings/attitude — interjections ('Ouch!'), lyric poetry |
| Conative | Addressee (receiver) | Aimed at influencing the receiver — commands ('Listen!'), advertising, vocatives |
| Referential | Context (referent) | Conveys information about the world — news reporting, factual prose, scientific writing |
| Phatic | Contact (channel) | Establishes/maintains communication — 'Hello', 'Are you listening?', small talk |
| Metalingual | Code (language) | Language used to talk about language itself — 'What does this word mean?', grammar books |
| Poetic | Message (the text) | Foregrounds the formal properties of the message — rhyme, rhythm, word choice, structure. THIS is the literary function |
The Poetic Function row (highlighted) is the most tested in UGC NET.
What UGC NET Actually Tests
- ▸Defamiliarization / ostranenie — Shklovsky, 'Art as Technique' (1917)
- ▸Fabula = chronological events; Syuzhet = artistic arrangement
- ▸Jakobson's six functions — know all six names and their orientations
- ▸Poetic Function — oriented toward the Message; defines literary language
- ▸Propp's Morphology of the Folktale (1928) — 31 functions, 7 character roles
- ▸Foregrounding — Prague School (Mukařovský); extends defamiliarization
- ▸The Dominant — Jakobson; the focusing component that rules other elements
- ▸OPOYAZ — Society for Study of Poetic Language, St. Petersburg/Petrograd, 1916
- ▸Prague Linguistic Circle — 1926; Jakobson, Mukařovský, Wellek
- ▸Wellek and Warren — Theory of Literature (1949); intrinsic vs extrinsic
- ▸Eichenbaum — 'How Gogol's Overcoat is Made' (1919); skaz
- ▸Literariness (literaturnost') — the Formalists' object of study
- ▸Jakobson's formula — Poetic function 'projects equivalence from axis of selection onto axis of combination'
- ▸A: Defamiliarization means making the reader unfamiliar with the characters. R: Shklovsky believed readers should not identify with characters. → A is wrong; defamiliarization is about making the formal medium strange, forcing genuine perception of the object — not about character identification
- ▸A: Jakobson's Poetic Function is the most important function in all language use. R: It foregrounds the message itself. → A is wrong; the Poetic Function is dominant in literary/poetic language specifically, not in all language use. Other functions dominate in other contexts
- ▸A: Fabula and syuzhet both refer to the same sequence of events in a narrative. R: Russian Formalists made no distinction between story and plot. → Both false; fabula = chronological events, syuzhet = artistic arrangement — this distinction is fundamental to Formalist narrative theory
- ▸A: Russian Formalism was suppressed because it focused on form rather than social content. R: Soviet cultural policy in the late 1920s demanded socially engaged art. → Both true; R correctly explains A
- ▸Shklovsky — Defamiliarization / ostranenie | Jakobson — Poetic Function / Six functions | Propp — 31 narrative functions | Mukařovský — Foregrounding | Eichenbaum — Skaz / Gogol's Overcoat
- ▸Fabula — chronological story events | Syuzhet — artistic narrative arrangement | Dominant — focusing component of a work | Literariness — the Formalists' object of study
- ▸OPOYAZ (1916) — St. Petersburg/Petrograd | Prague Linguistic Circle (1926) — Jakobson, Mukařovský | Theory of Literature (1949) — Wellek and Warren
Common Exam Traps
✗ Wrong: “Defamiliarization means making the reader feel alienated from the characters”
✓ Defamiliarization (ostranenie) means making the form of the artistic medium strange — breaking habitual, automatic perception so the reader genuinely experiences the object being described. It is about the reader's relationship to the artistic form, not about character identification. Brecht's alienation effect (Verfremdungseffekt) is a related but different concept.
✗ Wrong: “Jakobson's Poetic Function is about the poet's emotions”
✓ The function oriented toward the Addresser (sender/poet) is the Emotive/Expressive Function, not the Poetic Function. The Poetic Function is oriented toward the Message itself — the formal properties of the text. Know the distinction: Emotive = about the speaker; Poetic = about the form of the text.
✗ Wrong: “Fabula and syuzhet are both terms for 'plot'”
✓ Fabula = the raw events in chronological order (story). Syuzhet = the artistic arrangement of those events (how they are told). English equivalents: story/plot or story/discourse. This distinction is fundamental — the Formalists' contribution to narrative theory depends entirely on it.
✗ Wrong: “Russian Formalism and New Criticism are the same school”
✓ They are separate schools that share a focus on form and close reading but are historically and theoretically distinct. Russian Formalism (1915–1930, Russia/Czech) emphasises literariness, defamiliarization, and formal devices. New Criticism (1930s–1960s, USA/UK) emphasises close reading, irony, tension, and the well-wrought urn (Brooks). The New Critics were not directly influenced by the Formalists — they arrived at formal emphasis independently.
✗ Wrong: “Propp's 31 functions can appear in any order”
✓ A defining claim of Propp's Morphology is that the 31 functions always appear in the same sequential order — not all 31 appear in every tale, but those that do appear follow the fixed sequence. The order is invariant. This is the central structural claim of the Morphology.
Quick Revision Table
| Fact | Answer |
|---|---|
| OPOYAZ | Society for the Study of Poetic Language, Petrograd, 1916 |
| Moscow Linguistic Circle | 1915; Roman Jakobson |
| Key OPOYAZ members | Shklovsky, Eichenbaum, Tynyanov |
| Literariness (literaturnost') | The Formalists' object of study — what makes literature literature |
| Defamiliarization / Ostranenie | Shklovsky, 'Art as Technique' (1917) — making the familiar strange to force genuine perception |
| Fabula | Chronological story events — 'what happened' |
| Syuzhet | Artistic arrangement of events in the narrative — 'how it is told' |
| Propp's Morphology | Morphology of the Folktale (1928) — 31 functions, 7 character roles, always same order |
| Propp's 7 character roles | Villain, Donor, Helper, Princess (and her Father), Dispatcher, Hero, False Hero |
| Jakobson's 6 functions | Emotive, Conative, Referential, Phatic, Metalingual, Poetic |
| Poetic Function | Oriented toward the Message; foregrounds form; dominant in literary language |
| Jakobson's formula | 'Projects equivalence from axis of selection onto axis of combination' |
| Foregrounding | Prague School (Mukařovský) — literary language deviates from / intensifies ordinary language norms |
| The Dominant | Jakobson — the focusing component that rules/transforms the other elements of a work |
| Prague Linguistic Circle | 1926; Jakobson, Mukařovský, Wellek — extends Russian Formalism |
| Wellek and Warren | Theory of Literature (1949); intrinsic vs extrinsic approaches |
| Eichenbaum | 'How Gogol's Overcoat is Made' (1919); skaz (oral narrative style) |
| Why suppressed | Soviet cultural policy demanded socially engaged art; Formalism was politically suspect |
| Defamiliarization vs Verfremdungseffekt | Shklovsky: perceptual defamiliarization in art; Brecht: theatrical alienation effect — related but distinct concepts |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is defamiliarization (ostranenie) and why is it Russian Formalism's most important concept?▾
Defamiliarization — from the Russian ostranenie (остранение), literally 'making strange' — is Viktor Shklovsky's central concept, introduced in his essay 'Art as Technique' (Iskusstvo kak priyom, 1917). Shklovsky begins with a problem: habitual, automatic perception. We live most of our lives in automatism — we do not actually see or experience the things we encounter but process them through pre-formed recognitions. We 'see' a table without really looking at it; we 'read' a familiar text without truly engaging with the words. The purpose of art, Shklovsky argues, is to break this automatism — to defamiliarise the familiar, to make the known seem strange and new, to force the reader/viewer to experience the thing itself rather than their habitual recognition of it. Art achieves this through form: by making form difficult, extended, strange — by increasing the difficulty and length of perception — art compels attention. The Russian literary examples Shklovsky cites: Tolstoy's technique in War and Peace of describing familiar objects (a flogging, an opera) from an apparently naive perspective that strips away conventional understanding, forcing the reader to see the thing directly. The French critic Victor Erlich translates ostranenie as 'defamiliarization'; some translate it as 'estrangement.' For UGC NET: know the term in both English and Russian (ostranenie); know the essay title ('Art as Technique' / 'Art as Device', 1917); know Shklovsky as the author; know the core argument (art makes the automatic strange to force genuine perception); know the Tolstoy examples.
What are Jakobson's six functions of language, and which one is most important for literary theory?▾
Roman Jakobson's six functions of language are derived from his model of communication, presented most fully in 'Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics' (1960). Every act of communication involves six factors: an Addresser (sender), an Addressee (receiver), a Message, a Context (referent), a Contact (channel), and a Code (shared language). Each factor generates a corresponding function of language when it becomes dominant. (1) Emotive/Expressive Function — oriented toward the Addresser; expresses the speaker's attitude, feelings, or state (e.g., interjections, lyric poetry). (2) Conative Function — oriented toward the Addressee; aimed at influencing the receiver (commands, vocatives, advertising). (3) Referential Function — oriented toward the Context; the 'informational' function, conveying factual content about the world (most prose). (4) Phatic Function — oriented toward the Contact; aimed at establishing or maintaining communication rather than conveying information ('Hello', 'Nice weather, isn't it?'). (5) Metalingual Function — oriented toward the Code itself; language used to talk about language ('What does this word mean?'). (6) Poetic Function — oriented toward the Message itself; the function that foregrounds the formal properties of language — sound, rhythm, word choice, structural patterning — for their own sake. The Poetic Function is the most important for literary theory: it is what distinguishes literary/poetic language from ordinary language. Jakobson's formula: 'The poetic function projects the principle of equivalence from the axis of selection onto the axis of combination.' For UGC NET: know all six functions and their names; know which factor each is oriented toward; know the Poetic Function as the defining function of literary language.
What is the difference between fabula and syuzhet?▾
Fabula and syuzhet are Russian Formalism's key distinction for narrative analysis — they distinguish two levels of story. Fabula (фабула) is the raw material of the story: the events as they actually happened in chronological order, the 'what happened.' It is the story as it would be told in the most neutral, sequential way: event A happened, then B, then C, then D. Syuzhet (сюжет) is the story as it is actually told — the artistic arrangement of events in the narrative. It is the order, pace, and structure in which the fabula is presented to the reader. The syuzhet may begin in medias res (Odyssey — the events start in the middle of the action); it may withhold information (mystery novel — the murder has already happened, we don't find out until the end); it may use flashback (Beloved — Sethe's past is revealed gradually); it may tell the events out of sequence for emotional or thematic effect. The relationship between fabula and syuzhet is where literary artistry operates: the fabula is the same for any telling of a story; the syuzhet is the specific artistic arrangement the author has chosen. The English equivalents most used in translation: story (fabula) and plot or discourse (syuzhet). The French narratologists (Genette, Todorov) translated these distinctions into histoire/récit. For UGC NET: know both terms and their definitions; know fabula = chronological events / syuzhet = artistic arrangement; know these are Russian Formalist terms; know the English and French equivalents.
What are Propp's morphology and the 31 functions, and how does Russian Formalism use them?▾
Vladimir Propp's Morphology of the Folktale (Morfologiya skazki, 1928) is the most systematic work of Russian Formalism. Propp analysed 100 Russian fairy tales collected by Afanasyev and found that despite their apparent variety, they all share the same underlying narrative structure: a sequence of 31 fixed narrative functions that always occur in the same order (though not all 31 appear in every tale). A function, for Propp, is a unit of narrative defined by its role in the plot — not by who performs it or what the specific circumstances are. For example, Function VIII is 'Villainy': the villain causes harm or injury to a family member (by abducting, stealing, etc.). Whether it is a witch who steals a princess or a tsar who imprisons a hero, the function is the same. The 31 functions begin with the initial situation (not technically a function) and proceed through: ABSENTATION (a family member leaves), INTERDICTION (a prohibition is given), VIOLATION (the interdiction is broken), VILLAINY or LACK, DEPARTURE, PURSUIT AND RESCUE, RECOGNITION, RETURN, WEDDING and CORONATION (the hero is recognised and rewarded). Alongside the 31 functions, Propp identified 7 spheres of action — character roles: the Villain, the Donor, the Helper, the Princess and her Father, the Dispatcher, the Hero, and the False Hero. These roles may be filled by different characters in different tales or combined in one character. For UGC NET: know Propp's Morphology of the Folktale (1928); know the concept of narrative functions (defined by role, not character); know the 7 character roles; know that functions always appear in the same order.
What is the Prague School and how does it extend Russian Formalism?▾
The Prague Linguistic Circle (Prague School) was founded in 1926 by a group of Czech and émigré scholars that included Roman Jakobson (who had moved from Russia), Jan Mukařovský, and René Wellek. The Prague School took Russian Formalism's insights about literary language and systematised them into a broader linguistic and aesthetic theory. The most important Prague School contribution to literary theory is the concept of foregrounding (aktualisace in Czech, translated by Mukařovský) — the process by which literary language systematically deviates from, or intensifies, the norms of ordinary language, thereby drawing attention to itself. Foregrounding can work through defamiliarization (Shklovsky's concept — making language strange relative to ordinary usage) or through parallelism and patterning (making language conspicuously regular — rhyme, metre, anaphora). In everyday language, the medium is transparent — we look through the words to the meaning. In literary language, the medium is foregrounded — the words themselves become objects of attention. Mukařovský also developed the concept of the aesthetic function and argued that the aesthetic dimension is not a fixed property of objects but a relation between object and subject, socially and historically variable. René Wellek and Austin Warren's Theory of Literature (1949) synthesised Russian Formalism and Prague School ideas for English-speaking audiences and became the foundational text of Anglo-American literary theory. For UGC NET: know the Prague Linguistic Circle (1926) — Jakobson, Mukařovský, Wellek; know foregrounding as the Prague School's key term; know Wellek and Warren's Theory of Literature (1949); know the connection between defamiliarization (Shklovsky/Russian Formalism) and foregrounding (Prague School).