UGC NET English — Paper II · Unit IX

Reader-Response Theory — UGC NET MCQs

50 UGC NET–pattern questions across all 5 formats — including 15 assertion-reason questions— going beyond Iser/Fish/Jauss/Rosenblatt/Holland. Covers Gerald Prince’s narratee, Rabinowitz’s authorial/narrative audience, Riffaterre’s superreader, and Eco’s Model Reader & open work.

50 Questions15 Assertion-Reason5 Question TypesUGC NET Pattern

Assertion-Reason Format — How to Answer

A: Both A & R correct; R explains A

B: Both A & R correct; R does NOT explain A

C: A correct, R incorrect

D: A incorrect, R correct

Reader-Response TheoryUGC NET MCQs

Direct MCQ
1/51

Gerald Prince coined the term 'narratee' to describe:

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Iser's concept of the implied reader?

The implied reader is the role constructed within the text itself — the position the text inscribes for its reader — distinct from any real historical reader. Iser introduced it in The Implied Reader (1974) and developed it in The Act of Reading (1978).

What is Fish's concept of interpretive communities?

Interpretive communities are groups that share reading conventions and strategies. For Fish (Is There a Text in This Class?, 1980), these communities — not individual readers or texts — determine what counts as meaning. Different communities produce different but internally coherent readings.

How does Jauss's 'horizon of expectations' work in UGC NET questions?

The horizon of expectations is the set of cultural, literary, and generic assumptions a reader brings to a text at a given historical moment. Jauss uses it to measure literary value: works that challenge or transform the horizon (aesthetic distance) are more significant than those that merely confirm it. In UGC NET, match Jauss with the Constance School, reception aesthetics, and aesthetic distance.

What is the difference between Iser and Jauss in UGC NET assertion-reason questions?

Iser → synchronic (the experience of reading a single text); phenomenological; implied reader; gaps; wandering viewpoint. Jauss → diachronic (how a text is received across historical periods); reception history; horizon of expectations; aesthetic distance. Both are from the Constance School but address different dimensions of reading.

What are Rosenblatt's efferent and aesthetic stances?

Efferent reading focuses on extracting information from a text — the reading experience itself is discarded after the information is obtained. Aesthetic reading attends to the full qualitative experience during reading — feelings, images, tensions, and associations. For Rosenblatt, literary texts call for the aesthetic stance.

How is reader-response theory tested in UGC NET assertion-reason format?

Common assertion-reason patterns test: (1) whether reader-response theory is subjective/relativist (it is not — Fish and Iser both impose constraints); (2) whether Iser and Jauss are complementary (yes — synchronic vs diachronic); (3) whether the Affective Fallacy targets reader-response (yes — New Criticism's exclusion of reader emotion is what reader-response reverses); (4) whether Hirsch opposes reader-response (yes — he defends authorial intention against reader meaning-making).